Davidson on Saying That

Analysis 33 (4):138 - 139 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that davidson's analysis of sentences involving indirect quotation ("on saying that", Synthese, Volume 19 (1968-1969)) is inadequate, On the grounds that the analysans he provides has at least one logical consequence that is not shared by the given analysandum

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
116 (#185,103)

6 months
13 (#253,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William G. Lycan
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

Semantics for opaque contexts.Kirk Ludwig & Greg Ray - 1998 - Philosophical Perspectives 12:141-66.
You Can Say That Again.Ernest Lepore & Barry Loewer - 1989 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 14 (1):338-356.
Quotational theories of propositional attitudes.M. J. Cresswell - 1980 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1):17 - 40.
Believing in sentences.John Bigelow - 1980 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (1):11 – 18.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references