Compensation for Gamete Donation: The Analogy with Jury Duty

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):35-43 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Canada, laws and policies consistently reject the commodification of human organs and tissues, and Canadian practice is consistent with international standards in this regard. Until the Assisted Human Reproduction Act of 2004, gamete donation in Canada was an exception: Canadians could pay and be paid open market rates for gametes for use in in vitro fertilization. As sections of the AHR Act forbidding payment for gametes and permitting only reimbursement of receipted expenses gradually came into effect in 2005, Canada did away with this anomaly. Medical practice and legal prohibitions in assisted human reproduction are now consistent with other areas of medicine where tissues and organs are taken from one person to benefit others: Altruistic donation, rather than selling and buying, will be the norm

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Smart Men, Beautiful Women: Social Values and Gamete Commodification.Toby L. Schonfeld - 2003 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 23 (3):168-173.
Ethical Problems with Ethnic Matching in Gamete Donation.Hane Htut Maung - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (2):112-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
78 (#268,853)

6 months
10 (#410,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynette Reid
Dalhousie University

Citations of this work

The force of dissimilar analogies in bioethics.Heidi Mertes & Guido Pennings - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (2):117-128.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references