Commentary on Shepherd and Cameron and continuation of the revalidation debate

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):651-654 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01457.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What are the concerns of prospective responsible officers about their role in medical revalidation?Annabel Shepherd & Niall Cameron - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):655-660.
How should we train consultant appraisers? Description and evaluation of a pilot training model developed in Scotland.Judy Wakeling, Ian Staples & Niall Cameron - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):547-554.
Framing the EBM debate: a commentary on Saad (2008).Michael Loughlin - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):653-655.
Identifying poor performance among doctors in NHS organizations.Rachel Locke, Samantha Scallan, Camilla Leach & Mark Rickenbach - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):882-888.
Clinical guidelines tensions: and now where? Commentary on 'Clinical guidelines: ways ahead' (C.W.R. Onion and T. Walley, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 287–293, this issue). [REVIEW]Gene Feder Bsc Mb Bs Md Frcgp - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):299-300.
Commentary on 'Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer' (A.E. Johnson, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 119–126, this issue). [REVIEW]W. J. Cunliffe Md Frcs - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (2):129-130.
Commentary: The pen is mightier than the scalpel. Commentary on the paper – Public trust, and accountability for clinical performance: lessons from the national press reporting of the Bristol hearing (H.T.O. Davies and A.V. Shields, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5, 335–342). [REVIEW]James A. R. Willis - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (3):343-346.
Evidence and casuistry. Commentary on Tonelli (2006), Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 248-256.Toby Lipman - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):269-272.
Beyond ‘evidence’. Commentary on Tonelli (2006), Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12, 248-256.M. Gupta - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):296-298.
Critical commentary on 'Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches.'.Ross E. G. Upshur - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):281-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
11 (#1,422,077)

6 months
5 (#1,050,400)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references