What does the double hermeneutic explain/justify?

Social Epistemology 7 (2):193 – 204 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social Epistemology for Theodicy without Deference: Response to William Lynch.Steve Fuller - 2016 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (2):207-218.
What ought the historian of science know? A reply to Lynch.David Oldroyd - 1989 - Social Epistemology 3 (4):367 – 372.
Reply to Lynch.Hans Harbers & Gerard de Vries - 1993 - Social Epistemology 7 (2):205 – 208.
Response to Lynch: Fuller Transformed—Back to the USSR.Francis Remedios & Val Dusek - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (5):524-529.
The Path Taken and Not Taken in Social Epistemology.Steve Fuller - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (5):530-536.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-01

Downloads
63 (#324,700)

6 months
3 (#1,498,119)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?