Some innocent questions about language

Think 20 (57):103-106 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTPhilosophers and others often believe that a language used to talk about usage in a particular language should not be mixed with use of that language itself. I argue below that this opinion is mistaken.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,067

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Use, meaning, and theoretical commitment.Eike Von Savigny - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):175-204.
Divine Language.Graham Oppy - forthcoming - Sophia.
The Cognitive Value of Language.Stavroula N. Glezakos - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Solipsism and the Solitary Language User.Irwin Goldstein - 2007 - Philosophical Papers 36 (1):35-47.
Language and thought.Christopher Gauker - 1999 - A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Zagadnienie zakresu języka.Roman Godlewski - 2006 - Filo-Sofija 6 (1(6)):119-134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-14

Downloads
20 (#1,065,106)

6 months
7 (#658,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references