Postmodernist sophistry, shoddy peer review, and academic dishonesty: How subjective science knowledge and patience for nonsense may cause (pseudo-)scholarly hoax. Boghossian et al. affair

Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (14):1408-1412 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 51, Issue 14, December 2019, Page 1408-1412.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Talents and distributive justice: An interview with Hillel Steiner.Mitja Sardoc - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (14):1393-1398.
New histories of capitalism: from delineation to critique.Michael A. Peters & David Neilson - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (14):1399-1407.
Back from the Brink, a new humanities? An interview with Brian Opie.Michael A. Peters - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (13):1283-1292.
Academic integrity: An interview with Tracey Bretag.Michael A. Peters - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (8):751-756.
Education and philosophy: an introduction.Emile Bojesen - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (10):1061-1062.
The enlightenment and its critics1.Michael A. Peters - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (9):886-894.
Archival anxieties: Archival practices and politics.Margaret Joan Stuart - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (10):991-994.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-22

Downloads
34 (#668,917)

6 months
10 (#418,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references