A Pragmatic Requirement for Classically Valid Arguments

Logique Et Analyse 28 (109):75-78 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Double accusatives and valid inference.A. Broadie - 1982 - Logique Et Analyse 25 (98):199.
The pragmatic paradox of knowledge.E. M. Zemach - forthcoming - Logique Et Analyse.
A Universally Valid System of Predicate Calculus with No Existential Presuppositions.J. T. Kearns - 1968 - Logique Et Analyse 41:367-389.
Inadmissible arguments.B. Peppinghaus - 1976 - Logique Et Analyse 19 (73):119.
Moral arguments and moral beliefs.J. J. Mulhern - 1974 - Logique Et Analyse 17 (65):209.
Games, graphs and circular arguments.Douglas N. Walton & Lynn M. Batten - 1984 - Logique Et Analyse 106 (6):133-164.
Prudential Arguments in the Realism Debate.Erik Weber - 1998 - Logique Et Analyse 164:301-312.
Arguments against quotation-mark-names.J. Van Brakel - 1986 - Logique Et Analyse 29 (15):275.
Erotetic arguments from inconsistent premises.Joke Meheus - 1999 - Logique Et Analyse 165 (166):49-80.
Arguments from Ignorance and the Presumption of Innocence.Michael Wreen - 2003 - Logique Et Analyse 46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Woods on Ideals of Rationality in Dialogue.Jim Mackenzie - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):409-417.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references