- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Analogical Reasoning and Semantic Rules of Inference
Revue Internationale de Philosophie 270 (4):419-432 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Douglas Walton, Chris Reed, Fabrizio macagno, Argumentation Schemes. [REVIEW]Leo Groarke - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (2).
Leo A. Groarke, Christopher W. Tindale, and Linda Fisher, Good Reasoning Matters! A constructive approach to critical thinking (1997). [REVIEW]John Hoaglund - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (2):236-238.
Leo A. Groarke, Christopher W. Tindale, and Linda Fisher, Good Reasoning Matters! A constructive approach to critical thinking (1997). [REVIEW]John Hoaglund - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (2):236-238.
Conclusive analogical argument.R. O. Anderson - 1969 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 23 (1):44-57.
Woods, J. et Walton, D., Critique de l'argumentation: Logiques des sophismes ordinaires.Emmanuelle Danblon - 1996 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 2 (196):373-376.
Tindale, Christopher W. (2000). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. [REVIEW]Charles Arthur Willard - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (4):505-506.
Christopher W. Tindale, Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument Reviewed by. [REVIEW]David Godden - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20 (5):384-386.
Christopher W. Tindale, acts of arguing, a rhetorical model of argument.Arno R. Lodder - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):73-78.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-12-13
Downloads
241 (#106,762)
6 months
86 (#68,538)
2023-12-13
Downloads
241 (#106,762)
6 months
86 (#68,538)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Analogical Arguments: Inferential Structures and Defeasibility Conditions.Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton & Christopher Tindale - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (2):221-243.
A classification system for argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2016 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):219-245.
A classification system for argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):219-245.
Creative Argumentation: When and Why People Commit the Metaphoric Fallacy.Francesca Ervas, Antonio Ledda, Amitash Ojha, Giuseppe Antonio Pierro & Bipin Indurkhya - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
References found in this work
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary Hesse - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (62):161-163.
By parallel reasoning: the construction and evaluation of analogical arguments.Paul Bartha - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
By Parallel Reasoning: The Construction and Evaluation of Analogical Arguments.Paul F. A. Bartha - 2009 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press USA.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-jhg8z dc2