A reinterpretation of Harre's copernican revolution

Philosophy of Science 42 (1):67-79 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rom Harré's proposed Copernican Revolution in the philosophy of science is a very ambitious undertaking. It challenges established views, proposes a radically new model for scientific explanation, and forces a rethinking of the foundations of the field. In his treatment of the natural sciences, Harré rejects all deductivist accounts of scientific explanation basically on the grounds that such accounts seriously distort the methods of explanation actually operative in science. In the social sciences Harré, in collaboration with Secord, rejects mechanistic, positivistic, and behavioristic accounts of human behavior [5]. In place of these discarded interpretations he substitutes a new realism which stresses the role that models play in supplying accounts of observed patterns of phenomena in terms of the things and processes whose interactions are responsible for the manifest phenomena. This revolution, if successfully carried out, would indeed be a valuable contribution to the philosophy of science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modeling: gateway to the unknown: a work.Rom Harré - 2004 - Boston: Elsevier. Edited by Daniel Rothbart.
Models and Explanation.Alisa Bokulich - 2017 - In Magnani Lorenzo & Bertolotti Tommaso Wayne (eds.), Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Springer. pp. 103-118.
Mechanisms, Models and Laws in Understanding Supernovae.Phyllis Illari - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (1):63-84.
From Explanation to Understanding: Normativity Lost?Henk W. de Regt - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (3):327-343.
From Explanation to Understanding: Normativity Lost?Henk Regt - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (3):327-343.
Completing the copernican revolution.Burton Voorhees - 2002 - Foundations of Science 7 (1-2):213-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#344,015)

6 months
13 (#262,790)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edward MacKinnon
California State University, Hayward

Citations of this work

Science as representation: A reply to mr. Mackinnon.Rom Harré - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):146-158.
Scientific problems and the conduct of research.Brian D. Haig - 1987 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 19 (2):22–32.
The truth of scientific claims.Edward MacKinnon - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):437-462.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Phenomenalism.Wilfrid Sellars - 1963 - In Robert Colodny (ed.), Science, Perception, and Reality. Humanities Press/Ridgeview. pp. 60-105.
The Explanation of Social Behaviour.Alan Ryan, R. Harre & P. F. Secord - 1973 - Philosophical Quarterly 23 (93):374.
Passion and Value in Hume's Treatise.D. G. C. Macnabb - 1968 - Philosophical Books 9 (1):2-4.
Individuals.David Pears & P. F. Strawson - 1961 - Philosophical Quarterly 11 (44):262.

View all 9 references / Add more references