- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Deciding about decision models of remember and know judgments: A reply to Murdock (2006)
Psychological Review 113 (3):657-664 (2006)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
"Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: Comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004)": Reply to postscript.Neil A. Macmillan & Caren M. Rotello - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):664-665.
Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: Comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).Bennet Murdock - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):648-655.
Postscript: Reply to Macmillan and Rotello (2006).Bennet Murdock - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):655-656.
A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.John T. Wixted & Laura Mickes - 2010 - Psychological Review 117 (4):1025-1054.
Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: Reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit (2010).Karl Christoph Klauer & David Kellen - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):164-173.
Serial and free recall: Common effects and common mechanisms? A reply to Murdock (2008).Gordon D. A. Brown, Nick Chater & Ian Neath - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (3):781-785.
Decision-tree models of categorization response times, choice proportions, and typicality judgments.Daniel Lafond, Yves Lacouture & Andrew L. Cohen - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):833-855.
On the validity of remember–know judgments: Evidence from think aloud protocols.David P. McCabe, Lisa Geraci, Jeffrey K. Boman, Amanda E. Sensenig & Matthew G. Rhodes - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1625-1633.
Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: Remembering is faster than knowing.Stephen Dewhurst, Selina Holmes, Karen Brandt & Dean Graha - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (1):147-162.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
17 (#1,149,551)
6 months
5 (#1,012,768)
2016-06-30
Downloads
17 (#1,149,551)
6 months
5 (#1,012,768)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: Comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).Bennet Murdock - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):648-655.
Postscript: Reply to Macmillan and Rotello (2006).Bennet Murdock - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):655-656.
References found in this work
A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Bennet B. Murdock - 1982 - Psychological Review 89 (6):609-626.
Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing: A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model.Caren M. Rotello, Neil A. Macmillan & John A. Reeder - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (3):588-616.
Recognition memory and awareness: A large effect of study-test modalities on "know" responses following a highly perceptual orienting task.V. H. Gregg & John M. Gardiner - 1994 - European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 6:137-47.
Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: Comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).Bennet Murdock - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):648-655.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-jhg8z dc2