Review: Gram, Interpreting Kant [Book Review]

Idealistic Studies 16 (2):154-155 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For two hundred years, interpreting Kant has been regarded as a truly formidable task. But is the problem philosophical or philological? The answer which constitutes the raison d’être of this volume is that it is both. The introduction refers to “the need for the integration of philology and philosophy into philosophical semantics” and states that “This is also what makes the present undertaking distinctive”.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpreting Kant. [REVIEW]A. C. Genova - 1985 - Review of Metaphysics 38 (3):629-631.
Hegel’s Development. [REVIEW]Merold Westphal - 1986 - Idealistic Studies 16 (2):166-168.
Divine Immanence and Transcendence.Andrew Vincent - 1993 - Idealistic Studies 23 (2-3):161-177.
Divine Immanence and Transcendence.Andrew Vincent - 1993 - Idealistic Studies 23 (2-3):161-177.
Divine Immanence and Transcendence.Andrew Vincent - 1993 - Idealistic Studies 23 (2-3):161-177.
Where Does American Philosophy Stand Today?Frederick Sontag - 2002 - Idealistic Studies 32 (1):53-62.
The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy.Paul Guyer (ed.) - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
46 (#483,443)

6 months
19 (#155,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references