Miller's so-called paradox of information

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):144-147 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/17.2.144

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Miller's so-called paradox of information.Colin Howson & Graham Oddie - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (3):253-261.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
On a so-Called so-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.David Miller - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):147-149.
A Paradox of Information.A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information.A Paradox of Zero Information.Miller's So-called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.Miller's paradox of Information.The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.New Mysteries for Old: The Transfiguration of Miller's Paradox.David Miller, Karl R. Popper, Jeffrey Bub & Michael Radner - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
Miller's paradox of information.Jeffrey Bub & Michael Radner - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):63-67.
A comment on Miller's new paradox of information.Karl R. Popper - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):61-69.
MACKIE, J. L.: "Truth, Probability and Paradox".J. J. C. Smart - 1973 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51:258.
Mackie, J. L., Truth, Probability and Paradox. [REVIEW]J. De Greef - 1974 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36:600.
MACKIE, J. L. "Truth, Probability and Paradox: Studies in Philosophical Logic". [REVIEW]D. Edgington - 1976 - Mind 85:303.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
107 (#198,388)

6 months
19 (#151,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Have your cake and eat it too: The old principal principle reconciled with the new.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):368–382.
The straight and narrow rule of induction: A reply to dr Bub and mr Radner.David Miller - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):145-152.
New mysteries for old: The transfiguration of Miller's paradox.William W. Rozeboom - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (4):345-353.
A suggested resolution of Miller's paradox.I. J. Good - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):288-289.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references