Reality, sex, and cyberspace

In Unknown Unknown (ed.), MacHack conference proceedings (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Typical discussions of virtual reality (VR) fixate on technology for providing sensory stimulation of a certain kind. They thus fail to understand reality as the place wherein we live and work, misunderstanding it instead as merely a sort of presentation. The first half of the paper examines popular conceptions of VR. The most common conception is a shallow one according to which VR is a matter of simulating appearances. Yet there is, even in popular depictions, a second, more subtle conception according to which VR is a matter of facilitating new kinds of interaction. The latter half of the paper turns to questions about the contemporary technology of Internet chatrooms. The fact that chatrooms can be used in certain ways suggests something about the prospects for VR. The penultimate section asks whether chatrooms may legitimately be thought of as places. (In a sense, they may.) The final section asks whether cybersex may legitimately be thought of as sex. (Again, yes.) Chatroom technology thus provides an argument for the second conception of VR over its much ballyhooed rival.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,378 (#12,196)

6 months
91 (#68,650)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

P. D. Magnus
State University of New York, Albany

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sexual perversion.Thomas Nagel - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (1):5-17.

Add more references