Why Pragmatists Should Not Be Cyborgs

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 28 (4):472-488 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My project is to demonstrate the pragmatic importance of respecting the distinctions between science and myth and fact and fiction. In a country in which intelligent design is still taught as respectable science at some public universities and national figures make claims about “legitimate” rape,1 it is irresponsible to blur the boundaries between myth and science in some all-encompassing notion of “narrative.” Furthermore, its value as a political strategy is negligible because such blurring hinders the realization of those liberatory ideals in whose defense many progressive science scholars undertake their analyses in the first place—or so I will argue in this article.My procedure will be ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-24

Downloads
38 (#590,463)

6 months
8 (#574,086)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1962 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
The sentiment of rationality.William James - 1879 - Mind 4 (15):317-346.
Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy.Cheryl J. Misak - 2004 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18 (1):9 - 22.

View all 7 references / Add more references