- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Probability captures the logic of scientific confirmation
In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 69--93 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The non-standard approach to confirmation and the ravens paradoxes: Reply to Patrick Maher.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):109-128.
Patrick Suppes, Scientific Philosopher Vol. 1: Probability and Probabilistic Causality.Paul Humphreys (ed.) - 1994 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Book Review:Betting on Theories Patrick Maher. [REVIEW]Henry E. Kyburg - 1995 - Philosophy of Science 62 (2):343-345.
Patrick Maher, Betting On Theories Reviewed by.Arthur Falk - 1995 - Philosophy in Review 15 (2):120-122.
Confirmation, Paradoxes of.J. D. Trout - 2000 - In W. Newton-Smith (ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 53–55.
Betting on Theories.Patrick Maher - 1993 - Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Prediction and accommodation revisited.John Worrall - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 45 (1):54-61.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-12-22
Downloads
150 (#151,619)
6 months
10 (#404,653)
2010-12-22
Downloads
150 (#151,619)
6 months
10 (#404,653)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The structure of epistemic probabilities.Nevin Climenhaga - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (11):3213-3242.
On Strawson’s critique of explication as a method in philosophy.Mark Pinder - 2020 - Synthese 197 (3):955-981.
Updating as Communication.Sarah Moss - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):225-248.
References found in this work
Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Aspects of scientific explanation.Carl G. Hempel - 1965 - In Carl Gustav Hempel (ed.), Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press. pp. 504.
Probability Theory. The Logic of Science.Edwin T. Jaynes - 2002 - Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Edited by G. Larry Bretthorst.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-9l5tj dc2