- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Publication, politics, and scientific progress
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):220-221 (1982)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Scientific progress is like doing a puzzle, not building a wall.Alexa M. Tullett & Simine Vazire - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
Replications can cause distorted belief in scientific progress.Michał Białek - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
Consensus progress in brain science.Roland Puccetti - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (1):116-123.
The initial brain concept: A work in progress.Karl Zilles & Gerd Rehkämper - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):105-106.
Progress within the bounds of memory.Steven A. Sloman - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):679-680.
Progress toward a general theory of health.Theodore Melnechuk - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (3):406-407.
Hypotheses of neuroleptic action: Levels of progress.Roy A. Wise - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (1):78-87.
Looking backward: Progress in outer psychophysics.David J. Weiss - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):165-165.
Too paranoid to see progress: Social psychology is probably liberal, but it doesn't believe in progress.Bo Winegard, Benjamin Winegard & David C. Geary - 2015 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38.
Political bias, explanatory depth, and narratives of progress.Steven Pinker - 2015 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
41 (#549,457)
6 months
7 (#722,178)
2014-01-20
Downloads
41 (#549,457)
6 months
7 (#722,178)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.John C. Bailar - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):137-138.
Reflections from the peer review mirror.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):167-186.
Referee agreement in context.Lowell L. Hargens - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):150-151.
Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process.Jo Ann Carland, James W. Carland & Carroll D. Aby - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):95 - 104.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2