Utjelovljeni um. O komputacijskim, evolucijskim i filozofskim tumačenjima spoznaje

Filozofska Istrazivanja 26 (2):405-421 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suvremenu kognitivnu znanost ne možemo razumjeti bez najnovijeg razvoja računalne znanosti, umjetne inteligencije , robotike, neuroznanosti, biologije, lingvistike i psihologije. Kako klasična analitička filozofija, tako i tradicionalna AI pretpostavile su da sve vrste znanja moramo prikazati formalnim ili programskim jezicima. Ova je pretpostavka u proturječju s nedavnim uvidima u biologiju evolucije i razvojnu psihologiju ljudskog organizma. Većina je našega znanja implicitna i nesvjesna. To nije formalno prikazano, nego utjelovljeno znanje koje učimo radeći, a razumijevamo tjelesnim suodnosom s ekološkim nišama i društvenim okolišima. To vrijedi ne samo za vještine na niskoj razini nego i za visokorazinska područja kategorizacije, jezika i apstraktnog mišljenja. Utjelovljena kognitivna znanost, AI, kao i robotika pokušavaju umjetnom evolucijom stvoriti utjelovljeni um. S filozofskoga gledišta, zapanjuje da tradicionalni pojmovi kognitivne znanosti i AI s formalnim predodžbama znanja pripadaju tradicionalnoj liniji filozofije.Modern cognitive science cannot be understood without recent developments in computer science,Artificial Intelligence , robotics, neuroscience, biology, linguistics, and psychology. Classic analyticphilosophy as well as traditional AI assumed that all kinds of knowledge must explicitly be representedby formal or programming languages. This assumption is in contradiction to recent insightsinto the biology of evolution and developmental psychology of the human organism. Most ofour knowledge is implicit and unconscious. It is not formally represented, but embodied knowledgewhich is learnt by doing and understood by bodily interacting with ecological niches and social environments.That is true not only for low-level skills, but even for high-level domains of categorization,language, and abstract thinking. Embodied cognitive science, AI, and robotics try to build theembodied mind in an artificial evolution. From a philosophical point of view, it is amazing that thenew ideas of embodied mind and robotics have deep roots in the history of philosophy

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Filozofija, znanost i mediji.Blanka Jergović - 2010 - Synthesis Philosophica 25 (2):251-264.
Istina i smatranje istinom.Axel Hesper - 2010 - Synthesis Philosophica 25 (2):317-332.
Kulturne perspektive i znanstvena metodologija.Mislav Ježić - 2014 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 34 (4):471-485.
Perspektive filozofije: filozofija medija.Divna Vuksanović - 2014 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 34 (3):341-350.
Samostalnost znanosti o živome.Tonći Kokić - 2010 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 30 (1-2):211-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
78 (#269,459)

6 months
16 (#190,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Rogers Searle - 1969 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Searle - 1969 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (1):59-61.

Add more references