Bridges between Classical and Nonmonotonic Logic

Logic Journal of the IGPL 11 (1):69-96 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to take some of the mystery out of what is known as nonmonotonic logic, by showing that it is not as unfamiliar as may at first sight appear. In fact, it is easily accessible to anybody with a background in classical propositional logic, provided that certain misunderstandings are avoided and a tenacious habit is put aside. In effect, there are logics that act as natural bridges between classical consequence and the principal kinds of nonmonotonic logic to be found in the literature. Like classical logic, they are perfectly monotonic, but they already display some of the distinctive features of the nonmonotonic systems. As well as providing easy conceptual passage to the nonmonotonic case these logics, which we call paraclassical, have an interest of their own

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
36 (#627,593)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Makinson
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

What is a Non-truth-functional Logic?João Marcos - 2009 - Studia Logica 92 (2):215-240.
Fractional semantics for classical logic.Mario Piazza & Gabriele Pulcini - 2020 - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):810-828.
Conflicting imperatives and dyadic deontic logic.Jörg Hansen - 2005 - Journal of Applied Logic 3 (3-4):484-511.
Non-monotonic logic.G. Aldo Antonelli - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references