Russell and Strawson on definite descriptions

In Carlos Enrique Caorsi & Ricardo J. Navia (eds.), Philosophy of language in Uruguay: language, meaning, and philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Referential/attributive: a scope interpretation.Richard L. Mendelsohn - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (2):167-191.
Reference and descriptions.Andrea Bianchi - 2011 - In Marina Sbisà, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives for Pragmatics. John Benjamins. pp. 253-279.
Russell's Theory of Definite Descriptions as a Paradigm for Philosophy.Gregory Landini - 2002 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 194–223.
Philosophy of language: the classics explained.Colin McGinn - 2015 - London, England: The MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-30

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Malvasio
Universidad de la Republica Oriental del Uruguay

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references