Is Science Rational: Critical Analysis on Thomas Kuhn’s Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice and Harvey Siegel’s Inquiry Concerning the Rationality of Science

International Journal of Philosophy 8 (3):61 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Siegel on the rationality of science.Brian S. Baigrie - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (3):435-441.
Epistemological relativism in its latest form.Harvey Siegel - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):107 – 117.
Ii. a reply to Siegel on Kuhnian relativism.Gerald Doppelt - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):117 – 123.
Realism and the Epistemic Objectivity of Science.Howard Sankey - 2021 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):5-20.
Kuhn and the History of Science.K. Brad Wray - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Jang Pedersen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 40-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-29

Downloads
23 (#940,365)

6 months
7 (#706,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1962 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Critical Notice.Stathis Psillos - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):495-497.

View all 8 references / Add more references