Why Public Reason Could Not Be Too Modest: The Case of Public Reason Confucianism

Journal of Social Philosophy 50 (2):163-176 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Public Reason Confucianism, Sungmoon Kim presents an important Confucian political theory that seeks to combine a specific conception of Confucianism and the ideal of public reason. My article examines this theory and identifies some of the theoretical complications with Rawlsian public reason.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Confucian Public Reason Beyond Rawls.Sungmoon Kim - 2021 - In Robert A. Carleo & Yong Huang (eds.), Confucian Political Philosophy: Dialogues on the State of the Field. Springer Verlag. pp. 123-133.
A Confucian Conception of Public Reason and Bioethics.Ruiping Fan - 2021 - In Hon-Lam Li & Michael Campbell (eds.), Public Reason and Bioethics: Three Perspectives. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 93-134.
Public Reason Can Be Reasonably Rejected.Franz Mang - 2017 - Social Theory and Practice 43 (2):343-367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-21

Downloads
520 (#53,485)

6 months
158 (#26,455)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Franz Mang
Chinese University of Hong Kong

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Justice for hedgehogs.Ronald Dworkin - 2011 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Liberalism Without Perfection.Jonathan Quong - 2010 - Oxford University Press.

View all 17 references / Add more references