Actionable Consequences: Reconstruction, Therapy, and the Remainder of Social Science

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 34 (1):97-112 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Dewey and Ludwig Wittgenstein offer devastating critiques of the dominant model of human action that each inherited in their own time. Dewey, very early in his philosophical career, ostensibly put the stimulus–response mechanical understanding of action to rest with his “reflex-arc” concept article. Wittgenstein famously redescribed action as moves within language games that interconnect to constitute an interpretively open-ended form of life. In each case, these fundamental insights serve as heuristics, guiding our intellectual activity with regard to understanding our practices, and as reminders in approaching problems. Several scholars have interpreted Dewey and Wittgenstein as allies in a grand project of...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dewey, John, Liberalism and Social Action. [REVIEW]Bloch Bloch - 1936 - Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 5:119.
Group Morality and Forms of Life.Rick Davis - 2012 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-01

Downloads
46 (#478,781)

6 months
4 (#1,246,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lawrence Marcelle
New York University
Brendan Hogan
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):331-340.
Interpretation and the Sciences of Man.Charles Taylor - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):3 - 51.

View all 9 references / Add more references