Boundary conditions and the need for multiple forms of representation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):477-478 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Multidimensional space representations like those posited in Edelman's target article are not sufficient to capture all similarity phenomena. We discuss phenomena that are compatible with models of similarity that assume structured relational representations. An adequate model of similarity and perception will require multiple approaches to representation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The notion of distal similarity is ill defined.Ulrike Hahn & Nick Chater - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):474-475.
Representation and Similarity: Suárez on Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Scientific Representation.Michael Poznic - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (2):331-347.
Representation is representation of similarities.Shimon Edelman - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):449-467.
Structured models of semantic cognition.Charles Kemp & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):717-718.
Distal similarity, shape referents, subjective world, and redundancy.Hannes Eisler - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):470-470.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#855,855)

6 months
10 (#415,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references