Collingwood’s Claim That Metaphysics is a Historical Discipline

The Monist 72 (4):489-525 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The procedure I will follow in this paper requires a brief initial note of explanation. Collingwood’s texts are opaque at two points. First, he does not make clear what precisely he meant by the claim that metaphysics is a historical discipline. The prevailing interpretation—which I dispute—has been that he had in mind a similarity or identity of certain methods of inquiry or explanation. Second, and more seriously, he does not make clear the relationship of his two main treatises on metaphysics. They were written and published only seven years apart and one feels there ought to be some connection, if only that of explicit rejection, between them. Their connection is problematic; for they appear, on the surface, very different. Rather like the relationship of Plato’s Laws to his Republic. But Collingwood himself is almost completely noncommittal on how they stand, each to the other. He apparently saw in them some sort of continuity. But beyond this we have no sense of what he took their relationship to be.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,030

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-16

Downloads
114 (#198,673)

6 months
5 (#864,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Robin George Collingwood.Giuseppina D'Oro & James Connelly - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Robin George Collingwood.Giuseppina D'Oro & James Connelly - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ryle and Collingwood: Their correspondence and its philosophical context.Charlotte Vrijen - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):93 – 131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references