Epistemic legitimizing strategies, commitment and accountability in discourse

Discourse Studies 13 (6):789-797 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hart offers a biologically based explanation for the use of an ‘epistemic positioning strategy’ aimed by speakers/writers at the legitimization of assertions, at persuading addressees of the veracity of the propositions, as a prior condition for the discursive legitimization of actions. This article focuses on various issues addressed in Hart’s article, among them the degree of commitment invoked in speakers/writers’ choice of epistemic stance expressions as legitimization strategies, as well as the expression of subjectivity/intersubjectivity in discourse and the degree to which this involves responsibility and accountability for the speaker/writer. The article also provides an alternative proposal of the categories identified by Bednarek for the conceptual domain of evidentiality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A communicative conception of discourse.Patrick Charaudeau - 2002 - Discourse Studies 4 (3):301-318.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
19 (#1,052,169)

6 months
5 (#1,002,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 2013 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson (ed.), The logic of grammar. Encino, Calif.: Dickenson Pub. Co.. pp. 64-75.
The origins of meaning.James R. Hurford - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references