Il principio di beneficenza. Ripresa e attualizzazione di un principio cardine dell'etica medica e della bioetica

Abstract

This research project highlights the theoretical value and practical application of the principle of beneficence, trying to underscore its meaning and primary role in medical ethics and bioethics. The linguistic clarification of this principle distinguishes “benevolence” from “beneficence” and attempts to specify what is meant by the expression “patient’s good” and the term “good”. On the one hand, this analysis points to the complexity of the nature of the words and meaning referred by the principle of beneficence. On the other hand, it underlines the presence of descriptive and value elements in the expression “patient’s good”. A survey of the descriptive and prescriptive content of the principle of beneficence brings about an inquiry into the foundation of the obligation to act for someone else’s good — both within medical practice and moral experience in general. Furthermore, this underlines the different justifications of that obligation during the main phases of medical ethics and bioethics. It also notes a weakening in the concept’s normative strength due to a gradual change from understanding it in terms of duty, to a formulation that appeals to the vocabulary of principles. In this way, beneficence becomes understood with reference to, and in contrast with, the other principles of biomedical ethics, especially the principle of autonomy. After analyzing the conflicts among the principles, this work discusses the inadequate theoretical consistency of the principle of beneficence within that setting and argues for the necessity of its reformulation. In order to reach this goal, the weak links of the Hippocratic-paternalistic and the libertarian-autonomy approaches are exposed, as well as their erroneous descriptions of the principles of beneficence and autonomy. On account of this, I refer to the normative model called “beneficence-in-trust”, proposed by E.D. Pellegrino and D.C. Thomasma. Through a phenomenological and teleological approach to the clinical encounter, this model locates the ends of medicine in acting for the patient’s good. Expressed in these terms, the principle of beneficence is grounded on a particular human relationship that will remain constant over time in medical practice despite the unavoidable modifications of medicine and its goals

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

For the patient's good: the restoration of beneficence in health care.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David C. Thomasma.
Beneficence as a principle in human research.Ian Pieper & Colin J. H. Thomson - 2016 - Monash Bioethics Review 34 (2):117-135.
Deference, beneficence and the good life.Stephen S. Hanson - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (11):744-745.
How Autonomy Can Legitimate Beneficial Coercion.Lucie White - 2017 - In Jakov Gather, Tanja Henking, Alexa Nossek & Jochen Vollmann (eds.), Beneficial Coercion in Psychiatry?: Foundations and Challenges. Münster: Mentis. pp. 85-99.
Towards a More Credible Principle of Beneficence.Prasasti Pandit - 2021 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 38 (3):407–422.
Lessons for business ethics from bioethics.Josie Fisher - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):15 - 24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-16

Downloads
32 (#711,554)

6 months
4 (#1,263,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations