Legitimität und Radikalität des zivilen Ungehorsams Gandhis

Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 45 (2) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drawing on the Indian writer Arundhati Roy, M. K. Gandhi is often criticized today as an alleged racist and defender of the caste system. This debate obscures the radicality of Gandhi’s concept of civil disobedience. It is used as an attempt to delegitimize Gandhi as a possible reference for contemporary statements and struggles against wars, neocolonial exploitation and the destruction of the biosphere. The first part of this text is dedicated to refute these accusations and to restore the legitimacy of Gandhi as a reference for emancipative social movements and an inspiration to learn from his mass campaigns. The second part describes in detail Gandhi’s concept of a »revolutionary civil disobedience«. It is shown that this concept is based on an anarchist and anti-capitalist vision of a free society. That is why Gandhi’s radicality differs from a reformist interpretation of civil disobedience.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,665

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-24

Downloads
4 (#1,807,154)

6 months
4 (#1,232,791)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references