"It Would Have Been Worse under Saddam:" Implications of Counterfactual Thinking for Beliefs Regarding the Ethical Treatment of Prisoners of War

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44:650-654 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to criticism following news of the mistreatment of Iraqis at the US prison in Abu Ghraib, some media personalities and politicians suggested that the treatment of these prisoners ‘‘would have been even worse’’ had former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein still been in power. It was hypothesized that the contemplation of this argument has undesirable consequences because counterfactual thinking can elicit both contrastive and assimilative effects. In the reported study, participants considered how the prisoners at Abu Ghraib would have been worse off under Saddam. The results revealed that generating downward counterfactuals made participants feel better about Abu Ghraib (thereby evidencing contrast), and also lowered ethical standards regarding how the US should treat prisoners of war in the future (thereby evidencing assimilation).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Ethical Theory Can Improve Practice: Lessons from Abu Ghraib.Nancy E. Snow - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):555-568.
The Mistreatment of Iraqis at Abu Ghraib Prison.Russell Eisenman - 2006 - Journal of Information Ethics 15 (1):8-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-07

Downloads
258 (#105,500)

6 months
71 (#85,905)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Markman
Ohio University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references