Referent Systems and Relational Grammar

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):251-286 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Relational Grammar (RG) was introduced in the 1970s as a theory of grammatical relations and relation change, for example, passivization, dative shift, and raising. Furthermore, the idea behind RG was that transformations as originally designed in generative grammar were unable to capture the common kernel of, e.g., passivization across languages. The researchconducted within RG has uncovered a wealth of phenomena for which it could produce a satisfactory analysis. Although the theory of Government and Binding has answered some of the complaints, still it left many phenomena unaccounted for. Referent Systems (RSs) have been introduced by Vermeulen (1995) to overcome certain weaknesses of Dynamic Semantics. Their usefulness has not yet been realized in semantical theory. We shall show here that their significance cannot be overestimated. Namely, we will show in this paper that there exists a fundamental affinity to RG. Both handle the relation between an argument and a functor by means of a shared relational sign, which is unique for each argument. This assignment can be changed. What is interesting is that the notion of a chômeur, which is central to RG, finds a natural treatment in RSs. This coincidence is in our view not accidental but reveals some fundamental properties of the human language faculty.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A grammar systems approach to natural language grammar.M. Dolores Jiménez López - 2006 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (4):419 - 454.
Complex systems and renormalization group explanations.Margaret Morrison - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (5):1144-1156.
Cognitive Linguistics.Michael Tomasello - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 477–487.
Syntactic codes and grammar refinement.M. Kracht - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (4):359-380.
From the Origins of Government and Binding to the Current State of Minimalism 1.Artemis Alexiadou & Terje Lohndal - 2021 - In Nicholas Allott, Terje Lohndal & Georges Rey (eds.), A Companion to Chomsky. Wiley. pp. 23–51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#401,980)

6 months
9 (#449,254)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions.Irene Heim - 2002 - In Paul H. Portner & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Formal Semantics - the Essential Readings. Blackwell. pp. 249--260.
Dynamic Bracketing and Discourse Representation.Albert Visser & Kees Vermeulen - 1996 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37 (2):321-365.

Add more references