Transcendental Arguments for Personal Identity in Kant’s Transcendental Deduction

Philo 14 (2):109-136 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the principle aims of the B version of Kant’s transcendental deduction is to show how it is possible that the same “I think” can accompany all of my representations, which is a transcendental condition of the possibility of judgment. Contra interpreters such as A. Brook, I show that this “I think” is an a priori (reflected) self-consciousness; contra P. Keller, I show that this a priori self-consciousness is first and foremost a consciousness of one’s personal identity from a first person point of view.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-12

Downloads
1,146 (#17,771)

6 months
149 (#31,899)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline Mariña
Purdue University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Self-reference and self-awareness.Sydney S. Shoemaker - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (October):555-67.
Kant on self-identity.Patricia Kitcher - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (1):41-72.

Add more references