The Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation Algorithm–Moral Consensus or Pragmatic Compromise?

Analyse & Kritik 23 (2):271-279 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The selection and balancing of values for the Eurotransplant kidney allocation algorithm poses both practical and ethical challenges. The paper argues that any allocation algorithm can only be justified by reference to some substantive conception of a good life that reflects our value preferences regarding the allocation of scarce donor kidneys. It is concluded that the criterion of HLA compatibility maximizes overall rather than individual utility. The paper emphasizes that good pragmatic arguments for maintaining the primacy of HLA matching can never replace a more systematic, independent ethical justification. As neither the selection nor the balancing of the different allocation criteria are based on an explicit ethical justification, the paper concludes that the choice of the Wujciak-algorithm was rather a product of pragmatic compromise than moral consensus.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,067

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Distributive Justice in Kidney Allocation.Thomas Schmidt - 2001 - Analyse & Kritik 23 (2):286-298.
Should Children Be Given Priority in Kidney Allocation?T. M. Wilkinson & I. D. Dittmer - 2016 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (4):535-545.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-23

Downloads
55 (#402,037)

6 months
6 (#797,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?