VI -'It's Good To Talk'?

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):129-144 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The idea that there are some things which we should not talk about is most commonly dealt with in the context of debates about rights to free speech, and other contexts in which the value of talking is typically understood in instrumental terms. This paper explores ways of grounding that idea which do not depend upon instrumental values, in particular in the context of self-revelatory and confessional talk

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

'It's good to talk'?Sandra E. Marshall - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):129–144.
It's Good to Talk?S. E. Marshall - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101:129-144.
The right to life.K. M. Boyd - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (3):132-136.
Sensation and Synecdoche.Gareth B. Matthews - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):105 - 116.
‘It's Good to Talk’?E. Marshall Sandra - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):129-144.
Talking With Books: A Response to a Discussion.Richard Morehouse - 1983 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 4 (2).
Loose talk, the context of assessment, and skeptical invariantism.Wayne A. Davis - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#926,902)

6 months
8 (#528,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references