Do we (still) need the concept of bildung?

Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 (2):139–154 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
118 (#193,602)

6 months
15 (#211,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How to conceive of critical educational theory today?Jan Masschelein - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (3):351–367.
‘Plastic justice’: a metaphor for education.Kjetil Horn Hogstad - 2022 - Ethics and Education 17 (2):230-239.
The non-transparency of the self and the ethical value of bildung.Christiane Thompson - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (3):519–533.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
The psychic life of power: theories in subjection.Judith Butler - 1997 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
The Subject and Power.Michel Foucault - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777-795.
Empire.Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri - 2000 - Harvard University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references