Wrongness, Blameworthiness, and Overridingness

Australasian Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the Overridingness Claim, if it is morally wrong for an agent to φ, then that agent has decisive normative reasons not to φ. A common argument for the Overridingness Claim appeals to the connection between moral wrongness and moral blameworthiness. I argue that this argument fails.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Blameworthiness and Wrongness.Andrew C. Khoury - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (2):135-146.
"Two Senses of Moral Verdict and Moral Overridingness".Paul Hurley - 2011 - In Mark Timmons, Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 6. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 215-240.
Moral Worth.Nomy Arpaly - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy 99 (5):223.
Moral Excuses and Blame-Based Theories of Moral Wrongness.Benjamin Rossi - 2016 - Southwest Philosophy Review 32 (1):153-165.
Moral overridingness and moral theory.Sarah Stroud - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):170–189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-15

Downloads
1 (#1,954,454)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sam Mason
University of Duisburg-Essen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references