Abstract

Many years ago, Maurice Mandelbaum remarked that there were three branches of “formal” philosophy of history. One of these branches was said to deal with the objectivity of historical knowledge; a second was said to be devoted to the relation of the discipline of history to other branches of knowledge. Mandelbaum described the third branch as the “pragmatics” of the discipline of history. It was devoted to determining the “practical, educational, or intellectual value of a study of the past.” Mandelbaum conceded that this is a relatively minor branch of the philosophy of history and remarked that—as of 1952—investigations in the field had become infrequent. He also claimed that this branch of the field “presupposes” the other two.