Leibnizin vastaväitteitä molinistiselle voluntarismille (in Finnish) [Leibniz's Objections to Molinist Voluntarism]

Ajatus 72:53-69 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explain and discuss Leibniz’s main objections to the Molinist-Suárezian voluntarist (libertarian) conception of freedom, i.e., the conception involving the supposition of “freedom of indifference” of the will to make contrary choices in exactly the same circumstances. Leibniz’s main objections to the voluntarist conception are the following: (i) it violates the Principle of Sufficient Reason; (ii) it is based on a mistaken picture of the nature of the will.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was Clarke a Voluntarist?Lukas Wolf - 2022 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 4 (1):6.
Substancia y libertad.Juan Ardila - 2009 - Cuadrante Phi.
Restricted Theological Voluntarism.Mark C. Murphy - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (10):679-690.
Freedom has no intrinsic value: Liberalism and voluntarism.Jeffrey Friedman - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (1):38-85.
Personal responsibility and middle knowledge: a challenge for the Molinist.Joseph Shieber - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (2):61-70.
Modest Molinism.Michael Bergmann - 2022 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 8 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-25

Downloads
357 (#80,262)

6 months
71 (#83,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ari Maunu
University of Turku

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references