On the Lehrer-Taylor analysis of `can'-statements

Mind 77 (306):271-278 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/lxxvii.306.271

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Lehrer and Taylor on modal inference.Lowell Nissen - 1969 - Mind 78 (309):134-135.
Keith Lehrer and Richard Taylor. Time, truth and modalities. Mind, n.s. vol. 74 , pp. 390–398.A. N. Prior - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (3):401-402.
Free will, 'can', and ethics: A reply to Lehrer.Bruce Aune - 1970 - Analysis 30 (January):77-83.
Book Review:The Logic of Personality. Bernard Mayo. [REVIEW]Roger C. Buck - 1953 - Ethics 64 (2):144-.
Review of Bernard Mayo: Ethics and the Moral Life. [REVIEW]Mary Mothersill - 1959 - Ethics 69 (4):291-292.
The basis of industrial psychology.Elton Mayo - 1924 - Bulletin of the Taylor Society 9 (9):249-259.
Lehrer on 'could'-statements.Terence E. Horgan - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 32 (4):403 - 411.
Book Review:Ethics and the Moral Life. Bernard Mayo. [REVIEW]Mary Mothersill - 1958 - Ethics 69 (4):291-.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#947,178)

6 months
7 (#728,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references