- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Dialogue Games in Multi-Agent Systems
Informal Logic 22 (3) (2002)
Abstract
Formal dialogue games have been studied in philosophy since at least the time of Aristotle. Recently they have been applied in various contexts in computer science and artificial intelligence, particularly as the basis for interaction between autonomous software agents. We review these applications and discuss the many open research questions and challenges at this exciting interface between philosophy and computer scienceOther Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- amr.uwindsor.ca
(no proxy) - amr.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca [3] (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- phaenex.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- phaenex.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- informallogic.ca (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. [REVIEW]Peter McBurney & Simon Parsons - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (3):315-334.
Computational Uses of Philosophical Dialogue Theories.David Moore & Dave Hobbes - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
Introduction: Formal approaches to multi-agent systems: Special issue of best papers of FAMAS 2007.B. Dunin-Keplicz & R. Verbrugge - 2013 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 21 (3):309-310.
Transition systems for designing and reasoning about norms.Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (4):345-366.
The interrogative model of inquiry meets dynamic epistemic logics.Yacin Hamami - 2015 - Synthese 192 (6):1609-1642.
Medieval Disputationes de obligationibus as Formal Dialogue Systems.Sara L. Uckelman - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):143-166.
A Formal Model of Communication and Context Awareness in Multiagent Systems.Julien Saunier, Flavien Balbo & Suzanne Pinson - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (2):219-247.
Formal Modelling and Verification of Probabilistic Resource Bounded Agents.Hoang Nga Nguyen & Abdur Rakib - 2023 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 32 (5):829-859.
Plans, actions and dialogues using linear logic.Lucas Dixon, Alan Smaill & Tracy Tsang - 2009 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (2):251-289.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
68 (#307,702)
6 months
5 (#1,025,536)
2013-11-24
Downloads
68 (#307,702)
6 months
5 (#1,025,536)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
A domain specific language for describing diverse systems of dialogue.S. Wells & C. A. Reed - 2012 - Journal of Applied Logic 10 (4):309-329.
Comfort or safety? Gathering and using the concerns of a participant for better persuasion.Emmanuel Hadoux & Anthony Hunter - 2019 - Argument and Computation 10 (2):113-147.
Supporting Argumentation Schemes in Argumentative Dialogue Games.Simon Wells - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):171-191.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-9l5tj dc2