How can we build a “Women's” philosophy?

Metaphilosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nancy Holland (1990, 1) defines “women's philosophy” as philosophical work that “arises from, explicitly refers to, and attempts to account for the experience of women.” A “women's” philosophy, distinct from “feminist” philosophy, would depict the lived reality of women's experiences without an explicit or self-conscious desire to construct oppositional theories or arguments. This paper builds on Holland's discussion of a women's philosophy to propose a new perspective on the role and function of the philosophy curriculum. The paper shifts the conversation from one concerning whether a women's philosophy is “possible” to one that directly asks how we can build this philosophy. It argues that creating space for a women's philosophy need not require the reimagining of philosophical norms. Instead, the task should be understood as broadening perceptions of what counts as philosophy. The central claim is that we should witness curriculum construction as a tool for metaphilosophical intervention and as the first step towards building a women's philosophy. The paper shows how the incorporation of feminist autoethnography (a research approach and body of literature) into curriculums is particularly fruitful.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,246

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anne-Marie McCallion
Manchester Metropolitan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A defense of abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Inside Ethics: On the Demands of Moral Thought.Alice Crary - 2016 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Implicit bias, stereotype threat, and women in philosophy.Jennifer Saul - 2013 - In Katrina Hutchison & Fiona Jenkins, Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change? New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 39–60.
The politics of reason: Towards a feminist logic.Val Plumwood - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (4):436 – 462.
Anything but argument?Cora Diamond - 1982 - Philosophical Investigations 5 (1):23-41.

View all 12 references / Add more references