Power, integrity, and trust in the managed practice of medicine: Lessons from the history of medical ethics

Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):180-211 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bioethics as a field began some years before it was finally named in the early 1970s. In many ways, bioethics originated in response to urgent matters of the moment, including the controversy over disconnecting Karen Quinlan's respirator, the egregious paternalism of Donald Cowart's doctors in the famous “Dax” case, the abuse of research subjects in the notorious Tuskegee Syphilis Study, and the need to devise an intellectual framework for the development of federal regulations to protect human subjects of research. The phrase “new and unprecedented” became a common description of the topics and issues to which people who later came to be called “bioethicists” responded. It should come as no surprise that bioethics and its practitioners soon came to the self-understanding that their work was new and unprecedented, much as the innovations of biomedical science and their clinical applications were thought to be

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#509,414)

6 months
16 (#192,948)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Laurence McCullough
Baylor College of Medicine

Citations of this work

Health Care Reform: What History Doesn’t Teach.Nancy S. Jecker - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (4):277-305.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references