The Development of an Animal Welfare Impact Assessment (AWIA) Tool and Its Application to Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Control in England

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (4):485-510 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis is a controversial animal health policy issue in England, which impacts farmers, the public, cattle and badgers. Badgers act as a wildlife reservoir of disease. Policy options for badger control include do nothing, badger culling, and badger vaccination. This paper argues for mandatory Animal Welfare Impact Assessment for all policy that significantly affects sentient animals. AWIA includes species description, and AWIA analysis stages. In this paper, AWIA is applied to impacts of bovine TB policy options on cattle and badgers. Over 4 years, 85,000 badgers will be culled to prevent the slaughter of ~17,750 cattle over 9 years. Hence, about five badgers are culled for every cow which avoids slaughter. The AWIA analyses the impact of badger vaccination on cows and badgers based on a set of stated assumptions. The AWIA estimates badger vaccination to reduce the number of cows slaughtered by 11,600, i.e. a 12.5% reduction. Additional to the harm of killing, culling has greater welfare impacts on badgers compared to non-culling options. Actors in animal health and welfare policy were interviewed about the concept of AWIA. Policy actors supported the idea of AWIA to provide objective data to feed into policy making. The paper concludes with the proposal that AWIA is a necessary stage of just policy making where sentient animals are impacted by government policy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Control in Britain: Science, Policy and Politics.Steven P. McCulloch & Michael J. Reiss - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (4):469-484.
Bovine TB, Badger Culling and Applied Ethics: Utilitarianism, Animal Welfare and Rights.Robert Garner - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (4):579-584.
Animal Ethics and the Culling of Badgers: A Reply to McCulloch and Reiss. [REVIEW]Bernard E. Rollin - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (4):565-569.
‘Big science’ in the field: experimenting with badgers and bovine TB, 1995–2015.Angela Cassidy - 2015 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37 (3):305-325.
Animal Ethics and the Culling of Badgers: A Reply to McCulloch and Reiss.Michael Reiss & Steven McCulloch - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (4):565-569.
Animal Ethics and the Culling of Badgers: A Reply to McCulloch and Reiss.Bernard E. Rollin - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (4):565-569.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-20

Downloads
45 (#485,968)

6 months
7 (#671,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status.David Degrazia - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (195):246-247.
Bovine Tuberculosis and Badger Control in Britain: Science, Policy and Politics.Steven P. McCulloch & Michael J. Reiss - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (4):469-484.

View all 7 references / Add more references