Critiquing imaginaries of ‘the public’ in UK dialogue around animal research: Insights from the Mass Observation Project

&
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):280-287 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.12.009

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

From ‘public service’ to artificial insemination: animal breeding science and reproductive research in early twentieth-century Britain.Sarah Wilmot - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):411-441.
Emergence of a techno-legal specialty: Animal tests to assess chemical safety in the UK, 1945–1960.Anne-Marie Coles - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90 (C):131-139.
Societal Sentience: Constructions of the Public in Animal Research Policy and Practice.Ashley Davies & Pru Hobson-West - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (4):671-693.
Social imaginaries: the literature of eugenics.Alison Sinclair - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (2):240-246.
The work of the Animal Research Station, Cambridge.Chris Polge - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):511-520.
The work of the Animal Research Station, Cambridge.Chris Polge - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):511-520.
‘There is nothing less spectacular than a pestilence’: Picturing the pandemic in Mass Observation's COVID-19 collections.Annebella Pollen - 2023 - History of the Human Sciences 36 (2):71-104.
Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine.Simon Lohse - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):41-51.
How comparative psychology lost its soul: Psychical research and the new science of animal behavior.David Evan Pence - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 82:101275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-16

Downloads
17 (#1,150,890)

6 months
5 (#1,039,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How to choose your research organism.Michael R. Dietrich, Rachel A. Ankeny, Nathan Crowe, Sara Green & Sabina Leonelli - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 80:101227.
Care, Laboratory Beagles and Affective Utopia.Eva Giraud & Gregory Hollin - 2016 - Theory, Culture and Society 33 (4):27-49.

View all 11 references / Add more references