Dealing with Complaints to the REC

Research Ethics 6 (1):22-22 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701611000600106

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Dealing with Complaints to the REC: Commentary.Paula McGee - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (2):64-66.
Dealing with Complaints to the REC: Discussion.Stephen Humphreys - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (2):62-64.
The Membership and Function of the Research Ethics Committee.Colin Parker - 2008 - Research Ethics 4 (1):31-33.
Indemnity for REC Members.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (2):39-39.
When is a REC not a REC? When it is a gatekeeper.Nathan Emmerich - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (4):234-243.
Research ethics committees: The ineligibles.Stephen Humphreys - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (3):142-150.
The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC.D. L. H. Hunter - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):815-820.
Observations of a REC Lay Member: (Abridged from ‘Vignette of a REC Lay Member’).Carol Richardson - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (4):139-141.
Meeting the Needs of the Investigator and the REC Member.John Saunders - 2007 - Research Ethics 3 (4):111-112.
The Role of the REC in considering Changes to the Protocol.Joan Kirkbride - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (3):103-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
13 (#1,334,820)

6 months
8 (#622,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Should research ethics committees meet in public?M. Sheehan - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):631-635.

Add more references