Looks and Perceptual Justification

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1):110-133 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Imagine I hold up a Granny Smith apple for all to see. You would thereby gain justified beliefs that it was green, that it was apple, and that it is a Granny Smith apple. Under classical foundationalism, such simple visual beliefs are mediately justified on the basis of reasons concerning your experience. Under dogmatism, some or all of these beliefs are justified immediately by your experience and not by reasons you possess. This paper argues for what I call the looks view of the justification of simple visual beliefs. According to the looks view, such beliefs are mediately justified on the basis of reasons concerning how the relevant things look. Unlike under classical foundationalism, under the looks view as I develop it, these reasons are public. They are public with respect to both their content and possession: with respect to content, they are not about ourselves and our experiences, and with respect to their possession, many people can have the very same looks-related reasons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Do looks constitute our perceptual evidence?Harmen Ghijsen - 2020 - Philosophical Issues 30 (1):132-147.
Phenomenal Explanationism and the Look of Things.Kevin McCain & Luca Moretti - 2023 - In Kevin McCain, Scott Stapleford & Matthias Steup, Seemings: New Arguments, New Angles. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 217-232.
Defeating looks.Kathrin Glüer - 2016 - Synthese 195 (7):2985-3012.
Expert Knowledge by Perception.Madeleine Ransom - 2020 - Philosophy 95 (3):309-335.
How to Be a Reasonable Dogmatist.James Vincent Pryor - 1997 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Skepticism and the Foundations of Empirical Justification.Ali Hasan - 2008 - Dissertation, University of Washington

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-02

Downloads
924 (#27,088)

6 months
150 (#35,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew McGrath
Washington University in St. Louis

Citations of this work

Epistemic Reasons I: Normativity.Kurt Sylvan - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (7):364-376.
A Metacognitive Account of Phenomenal Force.Lu Teng - 2023 - Mind and Language 38 (4):1081-1101.
Experience, Seemings, and Evidence.Indrek Reiland - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (4):510-534.
The epistemic insignificance of phenomenal force.Lu Teng - 2024 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 109 (1):55-76.
Perceptual reasons.Juan Comesana & Matthew McGrath - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):991-1006.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2004 - MIT Press.
Knowledge in an uncertain world.Jeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthew McGrath.
Slaves of the passions.Mark Schroeder - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Contents of Visual Experience.Susanna Siegel - 2010 - , US: Oxford University Press USA.
Consciousness, Color, and Content.Michael Tye - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

View all 45 references / Add more references