The Role of the REC in considering Changes to the Protocol: Commentary

Research Ethics 5 (4):157-158 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study appeared in full in the last issue of Research Ethics Review (2009; 5(3): 127). Three submitted protocol amendments were presented for consideration of REC action. JG submitted a change in methodology, ST a project extension, and MJ wished to extend recruitment to include children and young people.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
21 (#1,009,308)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Author's Response.Paula McGee - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (3):104-104.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references