A comparison of socially responsible and conventional investors

Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):11-25 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Socially responsible investment is a rapidly emerging phenomenon within the field of personal investment. However, the factors that lead investors to choose socially responsible investment products are not well understood, especially in an Australian context. This study provides a comparative examination of conventional and socially responsible investors, with the aim of identifying such factors. A total of 55 conventional investors and 54 ethical investors participated in the study by completing mailed questionnaires about their investment and general behaviour and their attitudes and beliefs. Results indicated some important differences between socially responsible and conventional investors in their beliefs of the importance of ethical issues, their investment decision-making style, and their perceptions of moral intensity. These results support the notion that socially responsible investors differ in critical ways to conventional investors, and are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sovereign Bonds and Socially Responsible Investment.Bastien Drut - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (S1):131 - 145.
Information Asymmetry and Socially Responsible Investment.Mark Jonathan Rhodes - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):145 - 151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
141 (#158,404)

6 months
16 (#185,084)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Gardner
James Madison University