The Medical Nonnecessity of In Vitro Fertilization

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1):78-102 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Debate has raged in Canada recently over whether in vitro fertilization (IVF) should be funded through public health insurance. Such a move would require that the provinces classify IVF as a medically necessary service. In this paper, I defend the position I have taken publicly—especially in Ontario, my own province—that IVF is not medically necessary. I contend that, by funding IVF on grounds of medical necessity, governments like Ontario's violate their commitments to equality and fairness, and cause harm. They do the last by suggesting that the lives of people who forgo procreation, and perhaps have children in other ways (e.g., through adoption), will be stunted.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-26

Downloads
92 (#235,632)

6 months
11 (#246,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carolyn McLeod
University of Western Ontario

References found in this work

Trust and antitrust.Annette Baier - 1986 - Ethics 96 (2):231-260.
A rebuttal on health.Christopher Boorse - 1997 - In James M. Humber & Robert F. Almeder, What Is Disease? Humana Press. pp. 1--134.
Defining 'health' and 'disease'.Marc Ereshefsky - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (3):221-227.
Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy.Natalie Stoljar - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 19 references / Add more references