What does it take to prove fermat's last theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):359-377 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the set theoretic assumptions used in the current published proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, how these assumptions figure in the methods Wiles uses, and the currently known prospects for a proof using weaker assumptions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cut-conditions on sets of multiple-alternative inferences.Harold T. Hodes - 2022 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 68 (1):95 - 106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-08

Downloads
528 (#59,201)

6 months
17 (#181,383)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colin McLarty
Case Western Reserve University

References found in this work

Number theory and elementary arithmetic.Jeremy Avigad - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (3):257-284.
The weil conjectures.Brian Osserman - 2008 - In T. Gowers, Princeton Companion to Mathematics. Princeton University Press. pp. 729--732.

Add more references