When a device that later disintegrates is fitted to a patient during surgery, who is responsible for the consequences? What health professionals and hospitals need to know

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law:e2563 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consider the following hypothetical scenario: A patient suffering constant abdominal pain is referred to State Hospital A from her local clinic after not responding to simple analgesics for chronic pelvic pain associated with irregular menstruation. The doctors at State Hospital A discover that she has a suspicion of adenomyosis. She gives written informed consent for a hysterectomy. During routine postoperative check-ups she reports no alleviation of the pelvic pain, urinary frequency along with burning on micturition and a persistent vaginal discharge. Preoperatively, she was not told that the surgeons had inserted a surgical mesh to prevent vault prolapse. She is given antibiotics and further simple analgesia. As her symptoms do not improve she self-refers to State Hospital B. She is informed that she needs a CAT scan. However, the hospital’s scanner has been out of order for three years. She is advised to go to State Hospital C, where the scanner works, but is not given a referral note. She is told by Hospital C that the doctors are too busy to see her, and as she does not have an appointment, and is not an emergency case she should go back to Hospital A. She does not want to go back to Hospital A, as during her last visit there, nursing staff accused her of being a nuisance and escorted her off the premises. She approaches Private Hospital D, where her abdomen and pelvis are scanned. The scan shows the surgical mesh inside her pelvis which had disintegrated. She is told that it is too risky to remove all the fragments, but that some could be removed at a cost - which she could not afford. The surgeon refers her back to State Hospital A with a referral note and copy of the CAT scan report.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cynicism, with Consequences.Diane M. Plantz - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (2):12-13.
Retransplantation and the “Noncompliant” Patient.Mark G. Kuczewski - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):375-375.
Discharge Decisions and the Dignity of Risk.Debjani Mukherjee - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (3):7-8.
Aunt Peggy.Carolyn Chapman - 2015 - Voices in Bioethics 1.
Breaking the Readmission Cycle.Brian Hatten - 2023 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 13 (1):22-24.
Not the End We Planned For.Anonymous Four - 2014 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 4 (1):30-31.
Carmen Miranda.Jessica Les - 2013 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 3 (2):103-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-06

Downloads
1 (#1,946,451)

6 months
1 (#1,891,450)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thembelihle Khumalo
University of KwaZulu-Natal

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references