Response to Spriggs: Is conceiving a child to benefit another against the interest of the new child?

Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):343-343 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis—the risks are unknown and human dignity could be compromisedMerle Spriggs argues that there are no good reasons to prevent a couple utilising preimplantation genetic diagnosis when the sole aim of the procedure is that the resultant child is a compatible umbilical cord blood donor for a sick sibling.1 I agree with much of the argument to support this, however, I believe Spriggs has omitted one important point and underplayed another.The risk of PGD to the child born as a result of this process has not been fully studied. Therefore the parents are exposing the child to potential …

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preimplantation HLA typing: having children to save our loved ones.K. Devolder - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (10):582-586.
Jewish Perspectives on the Use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.Mark Popovsky - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (4):699-711.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
34 (#655,824)

6 months
1 (#1,885,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Saviour siblings.M. Spriggs - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):289-289.

Add more references